<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plethora of Social Media Tools, but not Twitter, Launch with Apps.Gov</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialgovernment.com/2009/09/15/apps-gov-launch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialgovernment.com/2009/09/15/apps-gov-launch/</link>
	<description>Turning Government into Government 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:57:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GovTwit Week in Review 9/14 &#8211; 9/20 &#124; GovTwit</title>
		<link>http://www.socialgovernment.com/2009/09/15/apps-gov-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-6998</link>
		<dc:creator>GovTwit Week in Review 9/14 &#8211; 9/20 &#124; GovTwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialgovernment.com/?p=453#comment-6998</guid>
		<description>[...] said it would follow in 2010 with a government-centric cloud of its own. Interestingly enough, Twitter was absent from the first cut of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said it would follow in 2010 with a government-centric cloud of its own. Interestingly enough, Twitter was absent from the first cut of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Government 2.0 Predictions for 2010 &#124; Social Government</title>
		<link>http://www.socialgovernment.com/2009/09/15/apps-gov-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-6591</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Government 2.0 Predictions for 2010 &#124; Social Government</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialgovernment.com/?p=453#comment-6591</guid>
		<description>[...] Plethora of Social Media Tools, but not Twitter, Launch with Apps.Gov  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plethora of Social Media Tools, but not Twitter, Launch with Apps.Gov  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mixed Signals on Evolution of Social Media &#171; Public Relations Rogue</title>
		<link>http://www.socialgovernment.com/2009/09/15/apps-gov-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixed Signals on Evolution of Social Media &#171; Public Relations Rogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialgovernment.com/?p=453#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>[...] U.S. Government launched a new internal site making a range of social media tools and applications available for download and use. The online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] U.S. Government launched a new internal site making a range of social media tools and applications available for download and use. The online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GovTwit Week in Review 9/14 &#8211; 9/20 &#171; GovTwit</title>
		<link>http://www.socialgovernment.com/2009/09/15/apps-gov-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-4267</link>
		<dc:creator>GovTwit Week in Review 9/14 &#8211; 9/20 &#171; GovTwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialgovernment.com/?p=453#comment-4267</guid>
		<description>[...] said it would follow in 2010 with a government-centric cloud of its own. Interestingly enough, Twitter was absent from the first cut of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said it would follow in 2010 with a government-centric cloud of its own. Interestingly enough, Twitter was absent from the first cut of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.socialgovernment.com/2009/09/15/apps-gov-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-4181</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialgovernment.com/?p=453#comment-4181</guid>
		<description>Twitter is widely used in government, and the reason it likely wasn&#039;t included on apps.gov is because GSA found that there was no problem with the Terms of Service for government, so no new terms were negotiated. This system is just a formal way of routing requests to the departmental points of contact who hold the Terms of Service for the department. While internal approvals for using Twitter would still be required (I would hope), I assume they didn&#039;t include it on apps.gov because that TOS piece is absent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is widely used in government, and the reason it likely wasn&#8217;t included on apps.gov is because GSA found that there was no problem with the Terms of Service for government, so no new terms were negotiated. This system is just a formal way of routing requests to the departmental points of contact who hold the Terms of Service for the department. While internal approvals for using Twitter would still be required (I would hope), I assume they didn&#8217;t include it on apps.gov because that TOS piece is absent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

