Social Government

Close Up: The EPA’s Blogging Guidelines

The Environmental Protection Agency’s blogging guidelines, “Blogging at EPA for Greenversations,” is a publicly available document that’s an interesting read. The PDF can be obtained here. We’ll take a closer look at the document after the jump.

We learn a number of things here. Not surpisingly, most posts are edited through the the public affairs office “for policy and legal issues; other editing will be very light, essentially only to correct spelling or grammatical mistakes.”

Other smart ideas:epa-seal

  • A posting minimum for supervisors (at least two posts a month)
  • Word count requirement (200-400 words)
  • No ghostwriting allowed!
  • Informal, personal tone is recommended
  • No mimicking news releases!
  • The legalese area, here known as “Cautionary Areas”
  • A checklist for blog entries
  • A requirement to have at least one image per post

We also get a behind the scenes look at the EPA’s business hours commenting policy. This clear policy is laid out in a way that prevents deviations.

This document clearly sets an example for other federal agencies. Hopefully agencies will be able use and expand on this document to create their own blogs. Greenversations is an oft-cited example of a properly done federal blog here, and now we know why: these guidelines are what make it so good. Of course, it’s also an interesting blog.

Many people who would need to blog don’t come from a blogging background, and this is what will bring them up to speed. So kudos to the EPA. And keep up the good work with Greenversations, too!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Related posts:
  1. A Fantastic Government 2.0 Resource
  2. Should Government Blogs Allow Questions?
  3. The OMB Director is Blogging. That’s a Really Good Thing.
Tagged With:  
  • Camille
    Nice post! The EPA's guidelines look really good and can certainly be used as a foundation for other agencies. I wonder how successful they are at making supervisors blog twice a month! Demerit?
  • Thanks for the review! I'm glad you think our guidelines are helpful.

    I'm not quite sure what we said that indicated supervisors would blog twice/month, though. We do ask our bloggers to commit to writing at least once per month, so their supervisors need to agree to that schedule.

    BTW, our bloggers are volunteers from all over EPA.

    Also BTW, our edits have been even lighter than the guidance says. I'm not sure we've ever even suggested changes for a policy reason, and legal issues have only come up a couple of times, and even then for pretty minor reasons. For example, to not mention a product by name so we avoid implying endorsement.
blog comments powered by Disqus